Day -865. WorldCup2018.
A quick read through the latest news on the Fifa presidential
candidates shows that there seems to be a patter emerging. The majority
of the European associations are going to vote for the UEFA man, Gianni
Infantino. In opposition to Infantino there is talk of an alliance
between the African backers of the African candidate Tokyo Sexwale and
the Asians who are hoping their man, Sheikh Salman al-Khalifa is the
next president.
Overall it looks like it is going to be a
repetition of the last couple of elections where Sepp Blatter campaigned
(campaigned? sure we'll call it that) heavily amongst the Africans and
Asians while the Europeans tried to make themselves believe that they
were offering a strong alternative. Who ever even really knew, or gave
it any consideration, whether anybody was a better candidate than
Blatter. A few "football development" programmes and some fancy new
stadiums, both with the associated revenues for anybody connected to the
projects, won over any consideration of the personal attributes of
Blatter, with no thought for the other candidate.
So it's the
Europeans up against the probable alliance of the Asians and Africans,
with the South Americans made to feel like their votes are important too
(but there's not many of them anyway). And then when the powers that be
figure that their candidate's potential votes need some boosting the
countries of North, Central America and the Caribbean federation, and
the Oceania islands will become very important players. Actually, let's
take North America out of there. There’s only two of them and I somehow
don't think, or I would like to believe, that the American or Canadian
associations could face their members if they voted for Sheikh Salman
al-Khalifa.
To take that thought a step further, I do not believe
that Fifa could be asked to be taken seriously as an organisation
promoting any sort of goodwill around the world if the majority of its
members think that Sheikh Salman is a suitable person to lead them. The
Sheikh has been accused of being involved in identifying athletes who
were involved in pro-democracy demonstrations in Bahrain in 2011 and
that some of those identified were imprisoned and tortured. Of course
there have been official denials and reports of investigations produced
to show he had no involvement. But, in response to reports of him now
being the favourite to become the next Fifa president, here is, once
again, the view of Nicholas McGeehan, the Gulf researcher at Human
Rights Watch:
"If a member of Bahrain’s royal family is the
cleanest pair of hands that Fifa can find, then the organisation would
appear to have the shallowest and least ethical pool of talent in world
sport."
And more from Mr McGeehan:
"At a time when Fifa is
going through the biggest crisis in its history it would seem like an
act of institutional suicide for it to appoint as its leader a man who
was apparently responsible for sanctioning clubs who failed to show
loyalty to a murderous regime.”
No comments:
Post a Comment